← Back to lettersOUR CRITERION REGARDING THE RELATIONSHIPS WITH THE MEN OF EARTH.
It is not possible to synthesize our current culture without running the risk that our conceptions may appear unconvincing as they are not accompanied by argumentation developed with the desired depth. We wish to offer you a superficial overview of the intellectual foundations of our social structure at different levels that may be familiar to you: COSMOPHILOSOPHICAL RELIGIOUS - MORAL PHYSICS. For us, such discrimination is artificial to the extent that we consider the chain of the cosmos as a harmonious "whole" that cannot be atomized into disciplines or sciences without seriously distorting the truth. The links between the various aspects of the universe are so intimate that their mental projection in the form of watertight compartments can become alienating for the researcher. But the transcription of these ideas becomes truly difficult if you take into account the fact that your mental frameworks are shaped differently than ours. We cannot use a common language intelligible from both sides. Right now, in my effort to use in Spanish verbal idioms that are familiar to you, I suppress the flow of ideas that I could express easily if the meanings of your phonemes could correctly interpret my thought. Could your brothers Rilke, Neruda, Garcia Lorca, have expressed their exquisite sensitivity with the single verbal instrument of a vocabulary extracted from the index of an electronics manual? As far as we are concerned, it is not about searching for a phoneme or a Spanish word whose meaning is analogous to that of our corresponding word. Even if this first case were achieved, and even with a lexicographic analysis of the language, the complex expressions embedded by these 'words' would conceal unusual meanings for the topical habits of earthly thought. For this reason, the ideas proposed in these reports to other brothers of different nationalities are necessarily 'geotropic', that is to say, with a pronounced flavor of 'earthly cultural orientation', but this is due to the chosen means of social communication. The evocative power of the phonemes you are familiar with blocks any serious intention of exogenous cultural transference. The idea of offering you these conceptions as a doctrinal basis substituting the pillars of current earthly thought is far from our mind. Analogous reports to this one, but with different specific content, have been delivered by mail to philosophers, dignitaries of various Churches, graduates of different universities, technicians, publicists, and average-educated individuals from various countries of OYAGAA (Earth). We note that many of your brothers scorned such data by refusing to acknowledge our true identity. This attitude is orthodox from the 'viewpoint' of usual logic. Yet even the earthly OEMII who have kept these mechanographed pages in different languages with encouraging curiosity and who have skillfully balanced the mental reserve and secrecy we required, along with a conditionally open attitude of approval of our testimony, have never been forced to substitute their own ideas and geognosological conceptions for ours. We do not wish in any way – even by exhortation – that you fall into the temptation of swapping your religious, scientific, and politico-economic ideas with ours. You will recognize the validity of such a warning: Firstly: because our reports are purely DESCRIPTIVE. We offer you an account without the contribution of positive, rational, and convincing arguments to support them. It would be absurd for you to graft our stripped ideas, concepts, and assertions onto the ideological constellation formed by your educators from EARTH. Moreover, if this were the case, you would commit a serious extortion of the normal rhythm of social coexistence, the future of EARTH’s culture. The normal process of technology would be distorted, severely damaging the current geosocial chain. A revolution of your structures must forge within your own social network. A cosmic morality that we share respectfully prohibits us from intervening, except in unforeseen extreme cases. We do not come – at least my brothers from UMMO – as prophets descended from heaven to bring you a new doctrine, a new physics, a new religion, new mathematical conceptions, or panaceas for your social or pathophysiological ills, relying on our more advanced cultural maturity. Likewise, it would not occur to an engineer specialized in terrestrial constructions visiting a school of young children to distort the cycle of childhood education by trying to explain to the UYIIE how to build a cantilever bridge using reinforced concrete voussoirs. Naturally, this specialist could use comparisons and expressions accessible to these embryonic brains so that they could understand the technology that allows for spanning large spans through the construction of these structures. It is unnecessary to emphasize that a lesson of this kind is untimely in a puerile-pedagogical cycle. The purity of our intentions can be verified through the method used to contact you. If we truly wished to introduce our own mental world, we would exercise our proselytism supporting our texts with demonstrations, even sophisticated ones. We will not insist further on the fact that our stay on EARTH is due exclusively to a vital necessity, which you will understand, to study and analyze your biocultural evolution. It is only after understanding that your own barriers of skepticism protect us that we decided on this essay of intellectual symbiosis. We now offer you these documents, fully aware that they will be received with reluctance, and we entrust them to men of the EARTH like you, who, imbued with interest in extra-biological themes, would at least keep them until objective and true evidence confirms the authenticity of their origin. This is the only thing we recommend: Do not believe us. Receive these concepts with suspicion. Do not disclose them yet in the mass communication circles. Show yourselves skeptical even towards OEMII unfamiliar with this science (the one that analyzes these facts), but do not destroy these printed sheets. Together with a few thousand others distributed secretly, they constitute the historical precedent of the nascent relations between our two human networks.
OUR CONCEPTION OF THE AIOOYAAIODI.
Every thinker of EARTH will recognize the insurmountable difficulty involved in projecting abstract concepts onto untrained minds, reflecting the entire ideological richness of different philosophical schools. Our claim to offer you such conceptions condensed into a few paragraphs immediately sterilizes any possibility of homogenizing the criteria by giving them the appropriate form that we accept. But at least it will serve you to sketch, in quick strokes, an image of the structure of our thought. In the field of cosmology, the progress made is significant enough for the speculations of our ideologists to abandon the shifting ground of intuitions and rely on a purified and ubiquitous empiricism that has allowed us to formulate hypotheses much more substantial than those of the past. We can reveal to you that the first "shock" experienced by the old mechanistic conceptions of the Cosmos occurred when our cosmophysicists came to ascertain the true nature of physical space. Our model of the Cosmos is capable of responding satisfactorily to all questions that arise not only in Physics but also in the biological and psychophysical domains. It is compatible with the rich phenomenology of which we are the optional observers. However, it is not a definitive and perfect – real – model, for although it addresses our own formulations: what is being? what is non-being?... what is (S76-s1) - being? why are we here?... what is the "necessary" entity? (Note that I try to reflect the formulations most familiar to you) and yet, to harmoniously satisfy our subjective aspirations for knowledge, we sophisticatedly introduce erroneous convictions. For example, the one that consists of saying that there exists an objective model for us. The one that, to satisfy our own mental schemes proper to beings with defined cortical structure, we can qualify as OUT-OF-MY-MIND as a concept "apprehended" in its entirety, without taking into account that another thinking entity DIFFERENT-FROM-MY-STRUCTURE might also satisfy its own formulations by arriving at results incompatible with my STRUCTURAL SELF, but perfectly valid for it. But this is a corollary of the unsettling question raised first. Does an objective model of the "Cosmos" exist? If the answer is negative, the confusion introduced will make any hope of certainty impossible. But before expressing our ideas about beings, about the AIOOYAAIODI (DIMENSIONAL ENTITY), let us see how we consider the problem of information, whose alteration would forbid any possibility of us coming to an understanding.
LANGUAGE AND OUR LOGIC.
Our primary goal in our thinking was to develop dialectical foundations, a logic that was independent of language. This was of vital importance considering that our form of expression is bisynchrovalent, and that the verbal coding of thought in two modes of expression capable of being phonetically simultaneous (one through a linguoguttural mechanism similar to Earth languages, and the other through a code involving sequential repetitions of phonemes) predisposes to misinterpretations and is a source of deceit due to the ambiguity of the terms used and the emotional component during their expression. This is why our OIYOYOIDAA (a way of expressing ideas through a coded repetition of different words in the context of normal conversation) was chosen to serve as a foundation for verbal communication of our AADOO-AUGOOA (logics) concepts. Thus, transcendental ideas are expressed in a basic mathematical language. In this way, we, the OEMII of UMMO, can utilize three verbal instruments at will, used according to the individual's needs at each moment. The first, DU-OI-OIYOO (which can be translated as link language) uses ideograms in their graphic expression and connected groups of phonemes (note: the original word is 'voces', plural of 'voz': voice, noise, cry, word, vocable) that represent concepts, values, concrete objects, and even ordered complex ideas. It is a vehicle for discussing routine matters (domestic language, technical, macrosocial vulgarized). (See note 8).
NOTE 8: We will talk to you another time about our form of communication OANNEAOIYOYOO (you would say 'TELEPATHIC'), which allows us to connect the integral elements of our SOCIAL NETWORK over long distances. However, two difficulties tarnish this informative pathway: The initiation of contact between two OEMII takes a certain time. Complex concepts of transcendental logical nature cannot access this pathway, only useful for transmitting simple and topical ideas. During the teaching process, in transcendent meetings, in dialogues among those you would name intellectuals, when the hierarchs of our society (our supreme authorities are situated at three levels: UMMOAELEWE, UMMOAELEVEANI, and UMMOEMII) need to address members of the social network for transcendent reasons, and in more common cases when the urgency of the situation requires rapid information, two orders of ideas can be projected simultaneously onto our interlocutor. Of the two communications, the more transcendent, the more complex, the one requiring great accuracy of expression, is elaborated through numeric coding in which each number is entered by the repetition 'n times' of the same phoneme, aided by a particular modulation of these (see note 4).
NOTE 4: Let us illustrate with a real example this modality of verbal communication of information. For this type of language, 'vocabularies or words' are not used; propositions are encoded by agglutinating the components of the sentence (subject, predicate, and verb as you would say) into a coded proposition. Euphony matters less than the real meaning of the thought. Thus, the proposition: 'this greenish planet seems to float in space' would be expressed in our topical language (DU OI OIYOO) as: AYIIO NOOXOEOOYAA DOEE USGIGIIAM. But if we wish to express it through OIYOYOIDAA, only three coding symbols will be needed: PROPOSITION: (this planet floats in space) CORRECTIONS: (green...
Lettre Ummite#462