Letter Ummo 64

Mr. Sesma Manzano, You have sent us a CRITICISM regarding a prior fact that could be misinterpreted and consequently provoke reluctant attitudes and unjustified suspicions. We urge you to invite Mr. Gran (Enrique) to confront his version with ours. We have confidence in this gentleman's honorableness as well as in his objective mindset, and undoubtedly this will validate the truth of our report through his response. You insinuated RESPECTFULLY, AND DESPITE FEELING INJURED BY WHAT WE BELIEVE TO BE AN INJUSTICE, we would still ask that great credence be given to his statements and we accept in advance his arbitration. OFFICIAL VERSION OF THE SPANISH SECTION OF THE UMMOAELEWE DELEGATION ON AYOUUDA OOYAGAA On February 6, 1966 (earth year), one of our OAWOOLEEA UEWA OEMM (spaceships) landed not far from the road that connects the city of Aluche to the municipality of Casilda de Bustos, (Madrid). Two of our brothers disembarked with the further destination of our section in the Republic of Chile. Our chief of the Spanish section, Dei 98, son of Dei 97, and one of our brothers from South America, GOAWAA 541, son of GOAWAA 540 (who came expressly from Bolivia) were waiting for the February 29, 1966) with certain statements from this artist-painter that caught our attention, as the only way for us to know when a person was interested in space affairs in a country is the country's own press. According to the editors of this newspaper, the manifestations were as follows: 'I believe in the existence of Flying Saucers, YES, I also believe in the testimonies of absolutely serious people. It is moving to see a trace produced by an extraterrestrial artifact.' After we gathered information through our own means about his address and phone number, we initiated the first telephone contact with him. From the beginning, Mr. Gran was reluctant and reserved in the face of the anonymous call from our brother and Chief DEI 98. Extremely logical attitude of what point does our organization forbid us (once the plan is established) from modifying it at our discretion, due to a blind submission to our superiors. Mr. Gran should acknowledge that the interview offered little 'RISK' for him, aside from the sensation of ridicule in the case of a simple joke. Both attitudes (ACCEPT or REFUSE) were therefore intelligent and sensible. Since the hypothesis of a JOKE or an ACT OF A MADMAN could not be entirely dismissed, Mr. Enrique Gran adopted the latter attitude, and no one has the right to blame him if he acts and judges with impartial objectivity. OUR CRITICISM CONCERNS THE FACT THAT WE HAVE NEVER ASKED MR. GRAN FOR A MEETING WITH US IN AN ISOLATED PLACE AND THAT THIS NIGHT WAS NOT SO BAD TO PREVENT...