← Back to lettersMen of OYAAGA,
Allow us to introduce ourselves: Since March 28, 1950, the date we made contact with 'Earth', near De La Javie (France), we have been among you. We know for certain that this statement automatically disqualifies us. Forget that and listen to our grievance. A fraud has been committed, which we wish to report, even though we lack legal identity. A regrettable matter considering that some members of the Roman apostolic hierarchy and the entirety of the believers of this confession are innocent.
After the copy reported by Secundo Pia in 1898 (N.B.: The original contains 'After the copy reported by Secundo Pia...'. In fact, these are photos taken by the Italian lawyer Secundo Pia of what is therefore, according to the Ummites, the genuine shroud: 'a copy' is the true notion: photos are 'logical copies'. It is our word that limits the meaning of 'copy'. In fact, a photo, a mold, a sculpture, a drawing, a painting are all copies (or meant as such), more or less faithful. It is anything but the original. The idea of the word used by the Ummites is to indicate that it accounts for and that it is not the original. The other idea is expressed by 'reported' and we do not have a simple word to translate it, because it expresses that he made a 'report' (photos from multiple angles intending to be exhaustive), that he 'accounted for'), the academician Ives Delage (N.B.: This is actually Yves Delage misspelled in the original.) discovered that the blood stains on the SINDON revealed the sad truth. The prints still bled after the careful washing to which the body was subjected. The shroud was never wrapped in bands (PHAKIAI) as prescribed.
A clever falsification then begins when someone finds a piece of linen (crossed 4 in spike) manufactured in 1220 (Jaffa) of larger dimensions (N.B.: probably the genuine shroud, removed (see letter D505), is smaller.), cut to 4.371 x 1.116. The falsification of the imprint was obtained using an over-heated iron mold. (Pope Pius X, Benedict XV, Pius XI, John XXIII, and John Paul I knew nothing of the affair. We do not know if Pius XII was informed by A. Ottaviani). The fraudulent change of the shroud took place in 1928 (Turin). In 1985, His Holiness Pope Karol Wojtyla was discreetly informed via a coded letter from Cardinal Edward Cassidy, a member of a small group of Cardinals and prelates who desperately tried to prevent the matter from coming to light. With awkward haste, during a meeting, the Pope, Joseph Tomko, Joseph Ratzinger, and Anastasio Ballestrero decided to take advantage of the new A. de M. spectrometric technique (N.B.: A. de M. is the abbreviation for mass spectrometry: it is a complementary technique to the study of C14. The C14 study consists of deducing the age by comparing the levels of the sample in C14 and C12. Mass spectrometry is a technique that allows for better measurement, with more precision, of the two isotopes whose masses 12 and 14 differ... and their proportion in the sample). The aforementioned Ballestrero was tasked with submitting the samples. They knew the result of the medieval dating of the archaeological document so revered by all Christian communities is incredibly good. There is no error in the report of the analysis of the samples. The 'Turin Shroud Research Project' (Note: 'Shroud of Turin Research Project': It is the scientists who are targeted) is of course innocent despite its poor reaction. And alongside them, the many faithful sadly deceived for 'State Reasons' are also innocent.
Lettre Ummite#670