← Back to lettersEsteemed man of OYAGAA:
We are saddened by the situation that has arisen on your Earth because of the shroud. But do not judge that our sadness has a religious motive. We come to integrate ourselves on your cold star motivated by cultural reasons, being convinced that your Social Network has a rich history by valuing the fact that you find yourselves in a less advanced state than ours, that your psychology has a surprising typological variety and that your aesthetic talent (Pictorial) is undoubtedly much superior to ours (although the OEMMII of Ummo is sensibly more advanced).
Bear in mind that the appearance of hominids on our Extinct Star was prior to the appearance of human life on your geoid. It is not only the historico-geographical culture (Translator's note: the Spanish neologism is "historiogafica") that interests us, but the complex network of knowledge (Geology, Biology, Astronomy, etc.) that form the YAANEEYA (THE EXISTENTIAL COMPLEX) in which you are integrated.
As witnesses of this humanity, your heritage, we have not wished to intervene, faithful to our status as mere observers. We form a team of twenty-seven travelers located in various countries of Earth, and we maintain correspondence with small groups from Canada, Australia, Spain, the Soviet Union, Zimbabwe, and a few others. Our information is limited to submitting to you (Translator's note: the Spanish word is "suministrarles") our culture, without actively interfering in internal problems. (Only Spain has been the exception after our existence was made public).
The first years of our stay here (1950) were very hard because our notions near you were very limited and the languages we learned were very rudimentary. My brothers of that time were truly panicked that our existence among you be discovered. As the years went by, we understood that it takes more than a few identity declarations to be believed. It was necessary to validate by indisputable proof our existence on OYAGAA (verifiable scientific checks) without which our testimony would remain reduced only to a few of your brothers accused of having an irrational mentality.
This has assumed an almost perfect alibi. Able to pass among you as simple disturbed individuals with a systematized delirium of being extraterrestrials, we remained free from any unwanted harassment (They say about us that we are a group of prankster academics, or an international organization with unknown purposes, that we throw a smoke screen – playing on our denomination 671 / 1373).
29/04/18 (Note: UMMO is pronounced in Spanish similarly to the word for smoke, which is "humo") - with a very different purpose such as the sociometric study of credulity regarding UFOs, or perhaps even more troubling motivations. Perhaps an unacknowledged association with criminal ends. Now we will discuss our connection with a religious organization defending the Holy Shroud...). Yet, we reiterate that our interest in the Shroud has a meaning quite different from what we will briefly outline. Throughout history, various currents of a mythico-religious nature have forged within you as a requirement for man to believe in extraterrestrial life, headed by a creator god or a set of deified entities that would govern the extracorporeal life. Naturally, this desire has manifested itself universally, and we could not be an exception. On UMMO, we have encountered another OEMMIWOA (UMMOWOA) with characteristics similar to those of other cold stars with a comparable level of evolution. If the cultural state is analogous, it is inevitable that people identify it with a divine spirit. And on the few rare cold stars where it has not yet appeared, we await its coming (if people are informed in advance). Today we know that a being of this conformation belongs to another species. A profound mutation occurs that deeply changes its genome. This means that the change of species forces a series of DNA fragments to change structure. It is not merely a simple chain of nucleic acid altered by a chemical or viral agent as your genetic experts currently contemplate (such mutations are real but Earth biologists still refuse to consider an agent that could provoke directed teleonomy). Thus, it is unthinkable to presume such ordered genetic changes in a single pair. (A Spanish group has been informed more extensively) (Note: immediately after this word, there is a handwritten arrow reference probably by Darnaude indicating: "Document No. 792 = D792"). But we assert that such a change exists, and the new species has been known to you as Jessuha (Jesus). Its typology or phenotype is similar to Homo Sapiens Sapiens, although its brain, reproductive mechanism (he could not have children with a normal woman), and certain physiological functions differ significantly. Moreover, he is a more evolved individual endowed with a level of awareness that is much higher than average. It is crucial to emphasize that there is no divine intervention in his creation. His existence is explainable in the light of Biology. On an OOYAA (Cold Star) where such an OOMMIIWOA occurs, its sex is indifferent, although in our respective humanities (Earth and Ummo) the form of GEE (Male) has coincided. We know of cooled stars where OMMIIWOA was a female. It is necessary to point out (although we feel we might wound your sensitivity) that we do not share the same idea of creation as the humanity of OOYAGAA. God would be a superior entity who for you is both creator and responsible for all his creatures. God would, in principle, be a perfect entity that would explain the survival of man on Earth, as well as life after death. (For didactic purposes, we identify God with WOA although the two concepts are radically different). WOA, on the other hand, is a concept integrated into the Universe itself and parametrizable by science. This is a very different conception, which we will explain another time. Although the birth of an OEMMIWOA is not determined by the express will of divinity, a physical effect occurs that is incomprehensible to the current state of science but is a rarity, like spherical rays or the explosion of a supernova. This is why we study the figure of Jesus with attention, regardless of the religious connotations you cherish so dearly and that we deeply respect. This is our purely scientific interest regarding the case. There are profound differences between you and our conception of the World. Not only concerning our doctrine but also at the very basis of Formal Logic. You accept the principle of the excluded middle based on Aristotle's teachings; on the contrary, we base our existence on a very distinct logical versatility. Hence, our difficult relationship with you, which forces us into a costly adaptation process. Our thought is based on parametrizable and scientifically observable principles. The rest serves us as pure speculation and is an enriching source for our future models. We are therefore very rigorous in our beliefs.
29/04/18 But for you, these arguments are not convincing in the absolute sense. This would require several volumes to properly explain what we have expressed. We are aware that our explanations regarding OOYAAGAA are not orthodox, and you must interpret them as mere clarifications of our position. We had no religious motivation, and we view the historical figure of Jesus from a different perspective. We are simply appalled by the deception carried out under scientific coordinates. It pains us to consider that the only evidence you had has unfortunately been removed, leading to a significant delay in the evolution of the Social Network in which you are immersed. Your religious phenomenon has been inevitable at your evolutionary level, with some of your brothers seeing everything as negative. We regret diverging from this assessment. Although overall religious viewpoints have been alienating and distorted, the sincere positions of your brothers have enriched the Social Network, and we qualify their behaviors as negentropic (meaning; non-regressive, filled with goodness). In any case, we have been surprised by the worldwide uproar caused by the accelerated mass spectrometry dating based on the radiocarbon present in the samples. We admired the passion and excitement with which the news was received. Clerics and anti-clerics fanatically launch themselves, without basis, to refute opposing positions without any reason. Thus, we see attacks on the measurements taken in the laboratories of Oxford, Zurich, and Arizona, claiming that scientists are so foolish that they have not realized the samples contained carbon deposits accumulated over time. These commentators ignore that the small samples were chemically washed precisely to nullify this criticism. Even more nonsensical is a journalist's appraisal stating that it is the radiation present in the Shroud that is to blame (They continue to believe that the trace left by the body is radioactive in nature. If ionizing rays had been able to alter the linen, the radioactive carbon assessment would have given an older date. Just the opposite of what happens, and they would have dated the shroud several centuries before the year one (of the era of Jessuha). On the contrary, the enemies of the Shroud cling to this discovery of the fraud, considering that the deception is so evident that it is not worth insisting on this case. Both positions are monstrously misleading, let's see why. In the Christian world in which you operate (both in favor and against), your actions are subconsciously modulated by hidden religious feelings, and this seriously distorts your actions. Try to limit yourself to objective data, regardless of the sympathy or antipathy that people and ideas evoke in you: and reason calmly. Do you dare to follow us? We invite you to analyze objectively. Start with ourselves. You have received a strange letter signed by unknowns claiming to come from an even stranger place. This is most improbable, and we invite you to label us as mentally ill, or mere people who have nothing else to do but joke with you or cunning delinquents with unacknowledged intentions (the Spanish word is 'ignotas'). Forget us and faithfully follow the perfectly known facts. Analyze the Shroud calmly. Three highly reliable centers determine with explainable deviations that the time when the shroud was woven oscillates (on a normal error curve) around the 11th to 15th centuries. If you have a critical mindset, admit this assessment. Once official science has shown you the medieval deception of the Shroud, one begins to see "very clearly" the enigma of the body imprint traces. Then it would explain why such an imprint does not clarify through the transfer of exogenous products secreted by the body during decomposition. On the contrary, it is proven that the marks left on the sheet are due to a shift of the tissue molecules caused by a high temperature (over 200 degrees). This would mean that the shroud was not painted but rather falsified through a reproduction of Jesus, built of metallic alloy and heated to semi-incandescence. Thus, an 673 / 1373 deception seems to be elucidated.
29/04/18 committed between the 11th and 15th centuries through the credulity of believing OEMMII. This would be explained as such, that those who refuse to admit the supernatural refute its authenticity and do not accept thaumaturgical influences on a piece of fabric. Vittorio Delfino Pesce was the first to expose the deception on television in 1987 by approaching the method of operation, suggesting that it was crafted (the falsified shroud) using a relief mold heated to 230 degrees. But the enigma has not been unraveled so simply. Let's analyze the question dispassionately, coolly, scientifically. Who is the person, at a time subjected to cultural obscurantism, who would be capable of such a feat? This should have been a man knowledgeable in photographic optics, capable of being aware of what a negative would be and foreseeing what Secondo Pia would discover in 1898, and that one would obtain a three-dimensional image in the 20th century, ahead of NASA’s technicians. The unknown forger would also have needed to possess knowledge not only of how men styled their hair at that time but also the texture with which a weaving was made, crafted with linen. The most astonishing would be to note the forensic knowledge of a man able to pinpoint the exact spot of the crucifixion on a hand, situating it on the area of the wrist that you anatomically call the 'Destot point.' Do not forget that the artists of the time painted the body nailed in the palm areas, and his expertise in detailing through knowledge of criminology the abuses resulting from the torture the victim was subjected to. Furthermore, it attracts the attention of anyone who enters the hyper-puritan mentality of that era through the lack of modesty demonstrated by representing the trace of the nudity of his body. We denounce the sad reality. The Shroud was fraudulently swapped in 1929.
Lettre Ummite#673