← Back to lettersEDICATED TO ALL WOMEN OF THE COLD STAR EARTH
Women of the EARTH,
It would be extremely pleasing for us if you placed your hand on our chest as a sign of spiritual alliance; this letter addressed to the YIIE mentioned is actually dedicated to all the women of the EARTH. We, men and women of UMMO, have had the opportunity to interact with your sisters. Crossing boundaries and exceptions, we can observe that you are more understanding, cordial, and sensitive than your brothers, the men. We would like this message to be like a long lament of pain for the unjust discrimination your sisters endure on OYAAGAA.
Accustomed to a cold star where equal rights and competencies concern both sexes symmetrically; we are saddened to observe the degree of servitude to which the female collective is subjected, and the social roots of this phenomenon interest us so much that we are conducting a historical analysis of this submission. We have been so astonished by the vexatious treatment inflicted on your YIIE that we have not even dared to send messages to single women for fear of hurting male feelings and alienating your friendship. But we cannot spend any more time without revealing to you what we feel about this disgraceful treatment.
We are aware that we do not interfere in the social evolution of the Earth since our words merely reiterate and confirm what other anti-macho thinkers on Earth have repeated ad nauseam in denouncing this unjust sexual discrimination. We do this so that readers of this message know at least that we: Oemii from a distant star feel aversion and profound sadness towards the actions of many men, who do not find it sufficient to publicly display the sentiment of boasting that they do not mistreat, in gestures or words, the wife or companion. Many well-educated men, integrated into the social network, men like you who read our letter, never resorted to the repugnant practice of verbally assaulting and publicly humiliating; but there are many ways to humiliate a woman and diminish her intimate dignity, both in non-subtle ways and as painful as the obvious forms of treachery and abuses, because the moral suffering they provoke in sensitive women reaches unbearable levels.
By severely violating (against the fluid Negentropy of the Universe) the bioethical laws by not regarding your partner as an equal who deserves deep respect precisely for her somatic weakness. The man who depreciates this principle displays his cowardice since he takes advantage of his partner’s anatomical-physiological structure that makes her more vulnerable to the attacks of the stronger; and although sometimes she is more resilient and physically dominates the man, she is also a victim of the subtle aggression she endures from the rest of the social network whose conduct models are misogynistic.
The origin of this ignominious submission seems transparent; already in the period corresponding to the emergence on OYAAGAA of what you call Homo habilis, the male sometimes killed the female after the first distributions to dispute the right to scarce food. It is from an evolutionary phase; Homo Neanderthal when Earth women began to be take advantage of the long phases of incapacity of the YIEE to impose its tyrannical dominance. The reality is the same in all cultures and has roots in the highlighted causes. You have established castes that subject the weakest, more physically than intellectually, to be the passive plaything of the unworthy dominance of your companions of another gonadic sign. While none were slaves like her, the YIIE was servant and vassal, puppet and unarmed prey to your mockery and disdain, and sometimes to your physically aggressive behaviors dutifully endured.
You men of the Earth have monopolized history, you have written and distorted the true history of the shameful suffocation of the YIIE by the male companion. But we have uncovered many testimonies, we have gathered and discovered that of all the chronicles of the injustices committed in past centuries by the OEMII of the Earth against their own, none equals in refined cruelty that of the submission of women by their partner. Persecuted races could unite and fight against their predators, members of different castes could achieve a spiritual affinity and sublimation to endure the pressure from superior beings, slaves have been able on multiple occasions to unite against their owners... But women were isolated beings handicapped by education imposed by fathers to revolt against their dismal fate.
Only in the 19th century could they unite in suffragist movements to demand their civil rights; until then, the state, the homeland, power, the guardianship of fathers and husbands, distinct religions, and churches were establishments that weighed like stones upon the fragile beings of the YIIEE and prohibited any reflex of escape and liberation. Men created the myth of matriarchy. At no phase in the long history of the Earth has a woman been able to dominate the male, only in isolated cases, groups of women formed warrior squads of Amazons, sometimes very cruel, as a defensive reflex mechanism; it is only in isolated cases and in rural settings that a woman imposed herself as matriarch or queen, as a dominator of a social network, where paradoxically the other women were not freed from their servitude even though one of them occupied the throne.
But of all the macho cultures, none surpasses in antifeminist fanaticism like the Judeo-Christian. It was all the more guilty when, like the Greek, it conformed a much more elaborated and superior form of thought over other more backward civilizations, all the more guilty as it relied on monotheism, a more elaborate and intellectual form of religion, and yet was more obliged to repudiate any manifestation of slavery, including that of man over woman. But the image of God (JEHOVAH) within the people of Israel is, by a first blasphemy, portrayed in the scriptures as a cruel monotheistic figure who commanded his people to mercilessly exterminate women, men, and living children on the old land of Canaan and who legitimately confronted the invaders of the twelve tribes. Jehovah is a tyrannical, dominating male being without mercy, very far from the idea of WOA.
The only intelligent contribution of this people that invents a vengeful God is the break with the aberration of polytheism. Not only does the Jewish people distort the ontological concept of God, making him appear as a vengeful father who moreover allows his creatures to be tempted by Satan, an old reflection of Arizdman from Mazdeism [Ndt: Ahriman is the god of evil, Mazdeismo, the supreme god, representation of good in a perpetual struggle against Arhiman. Mazdeism is a very ancient religion, that of the Parsis, and it has some vigor in India today], but then develops a great constellation of myths and allows the assassination of Jesus, thus distorting the history of his life as if that were not enough.
The Jewish people pushes contempt for women to truly repugnant extremes; the polygamy of the patriarchs allows them to repudiate their wives since after all they descend according to the Hebrew myth from a rib of Adam. In Leviticus, it can be read that a woman who suffers from menstrual blood flow remains in submission for seven days. Impurity, which it touches, remains impure until night; any object it touches will also be impure. The adulterous woman stoned, the puritan Hebrews still proclaim blessed be the Lord for not having made us women.
It is therefore not strange that the Catholic Church, which takes on the whole written law of Israel, accepts and fosters the subconscious hatred inspired by women; the misogyny and aversion of the so-called Holy Fathers towards the feminine figure is truly pathological. St. Augustine goes so far as to say that a woman is a beast who is neither firm nor stable, and St. Thomas Aquinas in his great work refers to man's companion in very derogatory terms, saying that 'a woman is a failed man, an incomplete occasional being; man is the head of the woman as Christ is the head of man.' St. John Chrysostom emphasizes that there is no wild beast in the world as destructive as a woman, and it is unnecessary for us to repeat the exhortations given by St. Paul to the woman to submit to the masculine yoke. Tertullian exclaims that 'woman is the strength of the demon.'
The disdain of Christian theologians towards the female sex reaches such absurd extremes that some of them dare to bring before the Council the idea that women are devoid of souls. The mythical image of the tempting woman in paradise wreaks ideological havoc among these fanatical men who are filled with a literal interpretation of the Bible. It is not strange that the misogyny of the Catholic cleric leads to one of the most terrifying persecutions in the History of OYAAGAA, as thousands of poor old women, teenagers, and young girls were burned at the stake, tortured in the presence of sadistic priests under the terrible and absurd accusation of having sexual relations with demonic incubi. The direct culprit of these horrible deaths was undoubtedly the Catholic Church, which in this way has devalued itself forever.
Even during the years of the Argentine dictatorship, Catholic priests assisted and collaborated with the military, even going so far as to apply the torture device to newborns in front of their mothers. This procedure seemed correct to the Church to the point that Monsignor Medina flattered the military junta, declaring that torture is always lawful as long as it does not exceed 24 hours. The Argentine Catholic military, with the explicit permission of their confessors, specifically targeted women, violating them with sticks, introducing electrodes into their wombs to induce abortions, and cutting off their breasts. In the Army's mechanical school, one assisting priest even stated that the electrode should not be applied in the woman's mouth as it could fracture her jaw; it was more appropriate to introduce it vaginally or rectally. Of course, the Holy See was perfectly aware of what was happening.
We photocopied letters from the Secretariat of State in which they advised Argentine prelates to actively collaborate with the repression unleashed by the Argentine military authorities. This same advice is given by the current pontiff John Paul II to Chilean bishops, with the notable difference that the latter, indignant, refused to follow these guidelines and courageously confronted the dictatorial regime of their country. When a Chilean bishop, during the recent visit of the Pope to his country, privately related to him (conversation recorded by us) the horrible tortures endured on November 20, 1986, by two women (one with a degree and another with a master's in philosophy) at the hands of the police, John Paul II exclaimed, 'But we must take into account that both belonged to the communist party...' and when another prelate indignantly recounted the details of an episode where a journalist was burned alive by a carabiner, the Pope in a bad mood remarked, 'This would not have happened if she had stayed home to do household chores like any Christian and hardworking woman...'
Shortly after these comments, the Pontiff, in front of the shocked international public opinion, blessed Dictator Pinochet and in private letters to bishops worldwide warned them sternly that they must firmly reject the exotic idea that women could access the priesthood. How can we be surprised that you men of Earth adopt a macho and repressive attitude towards your YIIE (women) if the entity that rises as an interpreter of universal morality shows itself to be oblivious to women's rights, trying to obscure its execrable misogynistic ideology through the mythical adoration and cult of Mary, the eminent mother of Jesus, does not elude respect for women and their rights passing through the veneration and respect of the historical figure of a woman, except for the real respect for the rights of all living women of today.
It is as if a slave-holding society that represses and stifles the human rights of its serfs is trying to wash its guilt by worshipping on its altars the mythical figure of the first slave. But the real fault lies not only with the pastors of this Church, but also with the faithful men who allow such iniquity; it is unnecessary for us, saddened men of UMMO, to denounce them. All human males are fully aware that they violate the rights to dignity of their companions, as many male and female thinkers have raised their voices and denounced such injustice without their words meriting more than a shrug. There is neither ignorance nor lack of awareness of the problem among you, men of OYAGAA; the violation of women's rights is so transparent that this saddened letter does not attempt to rebound on what is well-known to you.
Some readers of our message may feel targeted as males, excusing themselves with the argument that they do not physically mistreat their women, do not rape them, do not deny them access to bank accounts, do not humiliate them with insults, do not deny them as wives the right to go out when they please. But there are veiled and subtle forms of machismo they should likely feel guilty about. The husband who does not help his YIIE in the overwhelming moments of household chores, the dominant husband who positions himself as the oracle rector of the family, stifling his companion's right to make decisions and express her views, the subtle ways of humiliating his wife by ridiculing her ideas, his lack of interest in engaging in intellectual meetings and conversations, are all other veiled forms of machismo.
Men of the Earth, we lack the authority to urge you to adopt higher ethical forms; this does not mean we do not feel the need for you to reflect on the treatment of your YIIE.
Lettre Ummite#695