← Back to lettersFERNANDO SESMA
Fernando el Catolico, 6
Madrid (15) - Tel: 257 24 52.
Since 1968, I have not responded to any letters. I also did not want to write on the subject. Thanks to the press and television, I have gained a certain popularity and I have also collected a rich range of hurtful attributes: mythomaniac, impostor, unbalanced mind, or even strange comedian, visionary, or someone living on extraterrestrial dreams. It is necessary for someone who has the courage to trust their own experiences, without human respect or prejudices related to conventional protocol, to take responsibility.
But it is only fair that, amidst so much negative criticism, the recognition of my relentless propaganda be acknowledged and that it has withstood the sterilizing course of time, just like my constant example to overcome the fear of ridicule and other fears and serve as a stimulus so that witnesses dare to speak. However, this has not been taken into account. Moreover, when experiences and evidence in which I have been the main witness are cited, strict silence is kept in these cases, leaving me alone with whatever may have taken away my prestige. (Remember, to cite just one, the evidence of San José de Valderas on June 1, 1967, announced by me and signed by numerous witnesses on May 30 of the same year). Along with this intimate disappointment, I have had another more serious one due to its universality. UFO scientific investigators do nothing more than a kind of case collection with more or less usual comments, always glossing over the more disconcerting and fundamental fact that THE EXTRATERRESTRIALS CONTRADICT EACH OTHER. As for investigations that claim to be spiritual or mystical, we can only say that they are reduced to receiving messages so that we may be good and that Humanity does not destroy itself, forgetting that advice is the easiest thing to give and the hardest to carry out. For all this, I promised myself to keep my research to myself, limiting myself to anticipating some things in my latest book "THE LOGIC OF THE SPACE VISITOR" (Tesoro Publishing, Avda. José Antonio, 43. Madrid). Would it have been appropriate under these circumstances to respond to the many letters I have received? I continued, yes, with my weekly chats at Café León, because this, in any case, was like an antenna and a barometer, but without going beyond the limits I had set for myself. But time passed and fortunately, I did not waste it. Regardless of the preparation of a practical and demonstrative work, I can assure one thing: THE MESSAGES AND BEHAVIORS OF THE SPACE VISITOR TAKE PLACE IN A COSMOSYMBOLIC LANGUAGE - THE ONLY UNIVERSAL LANGUAGE - (When they try to translate into our logical grammar, they become incongruous, inevitably contradictory). Why have they chosen this path of communication and manifestation? It is the one that addresses our subconscious or superconscious and also - above all - what we might call our Planetary Spirit, an essential factor in our human evolution.
04/29/18 E25-D612 JP Translation No original available TP53 Last Modification: 04/16/2018 Letter title: Extract from a possibly Ummo letter from 1964 in the magazine "2001" Date: The article notes "the photographed page that I'm sending you corresponds to a monograph that was received in Monterrey, Mexico, on October 8, 1964." Author: Possibly Ummo Destiny: The Director of the magazine "2001" (regarding the photocopy of this page) A physics professor in Monterrey (Mexico) (regarding the original document) Original language: Spanish Notes: Photocopies of "Revue 2001", No. 20, published in March 1970 in Buenos Aires, which would be a partial page of a so-called Ummo document that was received on October 8, 1964, by a physics professor in Monterrey (Mexico). This is the only page we have, and it is clearly connected to the correspondence of the time: stamp, the expression IBOSOO UU, and especially an ideogram that we have found in later letters (modulo symmetry), associated with a number like in other letters... This page really seems to be from the source, but the date of October 7, 1964, is not securely established. Therefore, it cannot serve as proof of a letter prior to "the Sesma era." Everything concerning this page, although very plausible, should be treated as conditional. It is not, in any case, "usable" as proof of the receipt date of a Ummo letter indicated as received in Monterrey, Mexico, on October 7, 1964. Likewise, the indications in the article do not allow this: "This allows me to categorically assert with indisputable evidence that Don Fernando Sesma only had an accidental access to the Ummo case when it was already "in the cooking" years beforehand in very restricted circles, within other countries (Mexico in 1964, Australia 1964, France 1959, Canada 1963, Spain 1965, U.S.A. 1963). At least that is when the verified references I have date back to." Jean Pollion has conducted a "partial reconstruction" (under magnification) from the S-D612 image reproduced hereinafter. The words at the limit of legibility and therefore uncertain have been highlighted in yellow. J. Pollion adds: "The page appears to be numbered 10 at the top right. The report should contain at least 74 illustrations. Legible stamp." Caution this document may not be of Ummo origin!
Small central column, below the Darnaude indication "No. 612": "Oummaine monograph received on October 8, 1964 by a physics professor in Monterrey (Mexico). Relates to a complex study of a communication network which, according to them, exists in our midbrain, formed by isolated atoms of krypton and which are in turn connected to the central nervous system." The page on the left, which seems of oummaine origin, is enlarged below...
Let's assign some arbitrary values R and R to the radii of the respective influence environments for a n (S-D612-s2) and (S-D612-s1) As we indicated in the previous paragraph; S ... exerts an influence that can be considered in advance as a neutral parameter for the process of transmitting informative flow between the two krypton atoms.)
We invite you to reconsider before analyzing the related phases of this Network. A topical notion of what you, terrestrial beings, call: Information Entropy (See image 20?) and page 11 (12?). In each elementary time interval, thermodynamic tensions generate small amplitude thermal energy flows e (t- τ): Let's set the interval as 0...t (S-D612-f1) so that an information entropy that implies the usual notion would be (S-D612-f2). You would then say (the Exposé on Ummo would be different since the concept of informational flow presents a notable semantic differentiation) that the distribution, which earthly mathematicians call canonical, is given by: Represents the kinetic energy of system S T its thermodynamic Temperature (S-D612-f3). The macroscopic thermal flow would be given (after simplification) by: This allows for values k = 1, 2, 3, .... (S-D612-f4) Hence (S-D612-f5) so that the canonical distribution, revised, is (S-D612-f6). There is another question which is necessary to emphasize before proceeding further: This image of the center generating informational flows does not serve as a thermodynamic model that would make the real concept of a generating center integrating the chain of IBOSOO UU coordinated that you, the earthlings, call Krypton Atom, more comprehensible. Naturally, as we evaluate on page 8, the informational flow emitted by the beam axes of the complex (Nt: It is written "compejo") of IBOSOO UU cannot have thermal character, even if the word "emitting" is correct to define the process, since it might lead you to think that the two elements of the Network located in the neurencephalon exchange energetic quanta in a coded sequence that constitutes the core of the message. No: the relevant model is valid for the time intervals described. Moreover: What influence could the distance S (Image 74) between the two Krypton atoms have regarding the transmission time? Evidently-
Lettre Ummite#897