"Ummo Letter 909"

Mr. Villagrasa: Dear Sir, As you remember since I have already written to you several times, I am the man who sends you the studies provided by the gentlemen from OUMMO. Since a lot of time has passed, I don’t know if you have forgotten the matter and came to believe that all this is a hoax or something related to espionage or something similar. If that is the case, it is better that you disregard this and tear up this letter, because I, although I still do not dare to have a meeting with you, have decided to write this circular letter (no. 1328) to the people on your list (no. 1329), who are engineers or graduates and who are the only ones who can be interested and understand this problem. The fact is that it will have been a year next month since I last saw these gentlemen and, since their real or unreal absence, I have discovered other things related to this matter and I would like you to know what my opinion on it is. Surely, you may say that the matter is too serious for my poor opinion to have any interest, but it is also true that I find myself between the bark and the trunk and do not know what to do. Certainly, the temptation to forget this matter, which has caused me more trouble than anything else, is very great, and my wife thinks so too, although she is more comfortable, in the long run it may be even worse. I will go to these reports. You know that on the last day of May last year (6/1/67), they left almost without saying goodbye (S.J Valdéras). Several had to come here from abroad for this, and even, I am sure, with their female chief, simply because she had stopped by my place. But here comes my first doubt about what I must do. Just a few days before, they had dictated to me many documents. The one who came most often was the gentleman "DEI-98". He would sit in the dining room with me and dictate very slowly because, in reality, I did not type fast. He told me the space I had to leave for formulas or drawings. Then he would read the sheets and sometimes cross out entire paragraphs. He had me buy a box of colored pencils which I still keep, then he and his companion would sit down and start to draw. He and Mr. "DAA-3" were wonderful at drawing. Almost none of them used rulers and they drew devices very quickly. Then they left the papers with me in a folder and noted in an agenda (no. 1330) the date on which I had to send them and to whom. I made two copies, as they requested since I had more trust in them. And afterwards, when it was finished, they stapled the sheets and drawings with a small metal piece, put the firmly fixed package on the table, and took a photograph of it. When there were at most two or three days left and they had to come again to dictate the date by which I should post the letters and documents, they would come back to read the pages and would take out a kind of ring that they put on their finger, and I would give them a stamp so they could put their seal. Then they would close the envelope, ready to send. But they often changed their minds and asked to cross out the sending in the agenda. As a result, I kept several letters and studies (no.) in my hands that were not to be sent, sometimes because the recipient had clearly written that they were not interested, or because they had gone abroad, and other times without saying why, although I am not stupid and I imagine it. So when the day arrived (1/6/67), they asked me for a series of things among which was to make small packages (no. 1332) with staples and the documents and studies plus (no. 1333) those whose date they had set in the agenda for delivery. But on the other hand, they had always instructed me that if they did not confirm the sending in the days before, I should not do it, and now that was the case. They suddenly left without saying goodbye (agenda date no. 1329), leaving me sheets and sheets with their instructions, and previously they had given me the order to deliver them obligatorily, and other times they had only told me, long before, the date but without confirming the delivery. Seeing that the days passed without news, I became discouraged. But a relative also advised me, and finally we decided what we had to do, because the matter was serious: wait a little longer and then bring all the documentation (no. 1334) that we had and also evidence (no. 1335) of great importance to the ministry and tell everything to the authorities. In case they still knew nothing at those dates. We also decided beforehand to erase from copies of the documents your names all of you and to tear up the lists so as not to compromise anyone in this matter. And afterward, if the authorities allowed it, let's say publish a book explaining everything to the nation. We discussed whether it was better to break the secrecy before or to call a meeting with those involved, but it was shocking in both cases because already on one occasion jointly with a professor from Madrid who knew them, they had told us to hold the said meeting, and then I had a serious disagreement with the gentlemen of OUMMO, they said it was serious what would result from disobeying the only favor they asked us, which was secrecy. Moreover, it seems that many of you, those who receive their documents, said that at all costs they did not want anyone to be informed, some out of fear of ridicule and others for other reasons. But it is clear now that we cannot keep this secret all our lives and what we assert is that if they have really left for good, I no longer have the obligation to obey them since delivering the news can no longer harm them, that was a scruple I had, and not only because they have always been fair with me, because even if it had not been so, it would be respecting their will since the only kindness they showed was enough to deserve it. We thought of doing all this, but upon my return from Andalusia, after several months, the other day with my brother-in-law I was going to see a gentleman to come to an agreement. It is possible that you know this gentleman because he has recently written to some of you about this matter. So if you already know his opinion, it is only fair you hear mine too, because I believe he should have warned me before writing, since he spoke of me and also knowing that for the secrecy of this matter, I cannot defend it as I do not agree. This gentleman met those of OUMMO after me. They chose him at a time when they had so many things to dictate that I, who was not very fast on the machine, was overwhelmed, and although he left me my work. At first, I knew there were others who wrote for them but they did not tell me how many, natural enough given the secrecy they imposed on all this and I did not ask them. But one day, he came with a gentleman from OUMMO who had come to Spain from America and introduced him to me. He seemed a very shy and very reserved man. Since then I have gone to his house and he has come to mine to bring me written documents since I was the one to whom he had to deliver them, and by that I don’t mean they trusted me more than him. This gentleman seemed very afraid of all this because at first he did not like to talk much and I believe that in reality he could not believe that these gentlemen came from another planet, but he did not dare to say it in front of me, because I was always enthusiastic and always spoke well of them, which is natural. On the other hand, I understand that if they paid him well, it was suitable for him to keep quiet and, as they say, to close his eyes. On one occasion, they had left Madrid and I also believe Spain because, for the reports they dictated to me then, they settled the account. Then we planned to hold a meeting to consider agreeing on what to do because the matter was becoming serious and involved many people, and I also had the list of several others who were also their correspondents. We managed to reach an agreement and made contact with a very well-known doctor who was also a professor and who knew those of OUMMO. I invited him and introduced him to the doctor who was most eager to organize the meeting I mentioned, inviting very important people and also the typist by several copies of the letter that this doctor wrote inviting everyone to agree. But since I have... On 29/04/18, I spoke to this professor; I don't know what he will say but he immediately noticed a big change when he spoke with him. Then he clearly told me that he did not believe that the gentlemen from OUMMO really came from this planet or any other. Among those things, that I know badly and when they returned to this, they reproached me for organizing this meeting, sending certain letters, and introducing the professor to him without permission. I should have just let him visit and him too according to their orders and he should have limited himself to calling me on the phone when he had work for me to send to the correspondents. But as a lot of time has passed since then, and having returned to this issue these past few months, the two times I called him he seemed to avoid the conversation because, the other day when I told him I was going to visit him with my brother-in-law according to their orders, his daughter always said he was not there but in a way that was not natural. I started to confront him that he had not kept the secret they demanded; sometimes he smiled as if mocking like he did months ago when we talked about OUMMO, and now he acted affronted because I told him that my brother-in-law and I spoke with the director of a newspaper. This is not fair because not only is this gentleman, known to one of my relatives, entirely trustworthy, but I know what I can tell him and what he can keep from me. Moreover, they left without telling me what I had to do if they did not come back. From a moral standpoint, I did nothing wrong. So when I told him that, he left me speechless when in a mocking tone he said, 'And how do you know they left?'. He then told my brother-in-law and me that on the night (1.6.67) they left, he was with his family a few kilometers from their embarkation and that it was to provide a service; they perfectly saw the departure of the aircraft and he already had proof that all of this was certain and he told me something else that he was offended by what I did and, what is even worse, although he was now driven by the enthusiasm he had for them. Thus I did not cast the first stone, and it was he who, without revealing himself, informed the others, while this gentleman knew well that one of the things they recommended the most was that neither of the two should speak of the matter more than they had allowed. COMMENTS FROM VILLAGRASA: This individual seems to be the other typist, the one who wrote to Marius Lleget in Barcelona and sent him photographs, a service they asked him to do and they told him the point where he should stand to take the photos and send them to the press. Under the pseudonym Antonio Pardo hides the second typist as I can prove: 1. The letter written by Antonio Pardo to Marius Lleget of which I have a photocopy is from the same machine as the professor’s letter, which was also written by him as they told me later; the decimal numbers are written with the comma above instead of below and the space between the quotation mark and the word is the same. He was in San José de Valdéras, he took the photos, wrote to Lleget twice who had written a book in which he asked to be informed of any such event and where he spoke of the landing in San José de Valdéras, and sent the photos to the press. They had previously sent us the announcement of their departure to establish proof. A. Pardo would be the one we surprised on June 1st of this year, exactly one year later when Farriols came here to make observations on the terrain on the height of the sun and the rest. The same person who took the photos a year earlier at the same time and stayed two days in Madrid, and the one who during the landing seen by my wife and Farriols who was with an architect friend from Barcelona to take measurements on the ground to verify the altitude of the device in the photos and a series of triangulations, a seat 600 with a couple and a little girl passed by three or four times, it was Pardo. COMMENTS FROM FATHER LÓPEZ GUERRERO, present at the recording of this tape. I have practically located the professor, a group from Seville including several doctors who have shown interest in the matter, a cardiologist, Tamarit? Gallego? the style of the letter is that of Gallego. These are the only two professors in neurophysiology. The rest of the tape transcribes the phone response from Enrique Villagrasa to Dr. Velázquez, professor and dean of the Faculty of Medicine in Madrid if he received an analysis of fabrics of the men of Oummo which Velazquez denied. Similarly, Tamarit and Gallego, qu